Follow me on Twitter, happy to take your suggestions on topics or improvements /Chris
Validation of data is an interesting topic, we tend to write code that looks really horrible in the sense that it contains a lot of checks. There are different situations when we need to perform these checks like validating a response from a backend endpoint or maybe verifying what goes into our REST API won’t break our code. We will focus on the latter, how to validate our API.
Consider the below code that we might need to write when we don't have a validation library:
if (!data.parameterX) {
throw new Exception('parameterX missing')
}
try {
let value = parseInt(data.parameterX);
} catch (err) {
throw new Exception('parameterX should be number');
}
if(!/[a-z]/.test(data.parameterY)) {
throw new Exception('parameterY should be lower caps text')
}
I think you get the idea from the above cringe-worthy code. We tend to perform a lot of tests on our parameters to ensure they are the right and/or their values contains the allowed values.
As developers we tend to feel really bad about code like this, so we either start writing a lib for this or we turn to our old friend NPM and hope that some other developer have felt this pain and had too much time on their hands and made a lib that you could use.
There are many libs that will do this for you. I aim to describe a specific one called Joi.
Throughout this article we will take the following journey together:
- Have a look at Joi’s features
- See how we can use Joi in the backend in a Request pipeline
- Improve even further by building a middleware for Express in Node.js
Introducing Joi
Installing Joi is quite easy. We just need to type:
npm install joi
After that, we are ready to use it. Let’s have a quick look at how we use it. The first thing we do is import it and then we set up some rules, like so:
const Joi = require('joi');
const schema = Joi.object().keys({
name: Joi.string().alphanum().min(3).max(30).required(),
birthyear: Joi.number().integer().min(1970).max(2013),
});
const dataToValidate = {
name 'chris',
birthyear: 1971
}
const result = Joi.validate(dataToValidate, schema);
// result.error == null means valid
What we are looking at above is us doing the following:
- constructing a schema, our call to Joi.object(),
-
validating our data, our call to
Joi.validate()
withdataToValidate
and schema as input parameters
Ok, now we understand the basic motions. What else can we do?
Well, Joi supports all sorts of primitives as well as Regex and can be nested to any depth. Let’s list some different constructs it supports:
-
string, this says it needs to be of type string, and we use it like so
Joi.string()
-
number, Joi.number() and also supporting helper operations such as min() and max(), like so
Joi.number().min(1).max(10)
-
required, we can say whether a property is required with the help of the method required, like so
Joi.string().required()
-
any, this means it could be any type, usually, we tend to use it with the helper allow() that specifies what it can contain, like so,
Joi.any().allow('a')
-
optional, this is strictly speaking not a type but has an interesting effect. If you specify for example prop :
Joi.string().optional
. If we don't provide prop then everybody's happy. However, if we do provide it and make it an integer the validation will fail -
array, we can check whether the property is an array of say strings, then it would look like this
Joi.array().items(Joi.string().valid('a', 'b')
-
regex, it supports pattern matching with RegEx as well like so
Joi.string().regex(/^[a-zA-Z0-9]{3,30}$/)
The whole API for Joi is enormous. I suggest to have a look and see if there is a helper function that can solve whatever case you have that I’m not showing above
Joi API
Nested types
Ok, so we have only shown how to declare a schema so far that is one level deep. We did so by calling the following:
Joi.object().keys({ });
This stated that our data is an object. Then we added some properties to our object like so:
Joi.object().keys({
name: Joi.string().alphanum().min(3).max(30).required(),
birthyear: Joi.number().integer().min(1970).max(2013)
});
Now, nested structures are really more of the same. Let’s create an entirely new schema, a schema for a blog post, looking like this:
const blogPostSchema = Joi.object().keys({
title: Joi.string().alphanum().min(3).max(30).required(),
description: Joi.string(),
comments: Joi.array().items(Joi.object.keys({
description: Joi.string(),
author: Joi.string().required(),
grade: Joi.number().min(1).max(5)
}))
});
Note especially the comments
property, that thing looks exactly like the outer call we first make and it is the same. Nesting is as easy as that.
Node.js Express and Joi
Libraries like these are great but wouldn’t it be even better if we could use them in a more seamless way, like in a Request pipeline? Let’s have a look firstly how we would use Joi in an Express app in Node.js:
const Joi = require('joi');
app.post('/blog', async (req, res, next) => {
const { body } = req; const
blogSchema = Joi.object().keys({
title: Joi.string().required
description: Joi.string().required(),
authorId: Joi.number().required()
});
const result = Joi.validate(body, blogShema);
const { value, error } = result;
const valid = error == null;
if (!valid) {
res.status(422).json({
message: 'Invalid request',
data: body
})
} else {
const createdPost = await api.createPost(data);
res.json({ message: 'Resource created', data: createdPost })
}
});
The above works. But we have to, for each route:
- create a schema
- call
validate()
It’s, for lack of a better word, lacking in elegance. We want something slick looking.
Building a middleware
Let’s see if we can’t rebuild it a bit to a middleware. Middlewares in Express is simply something we can stick into the request pipeline whenever we need it. In our case, we would want to try and verify our request and early on determine whether it is worth proceeding with it or abort it.
So let’s look at a middleware. It’s just a function right:
const handler = (req, res, next) = { // handle our request }
const middleware = (req, res, next) => { // to be defined }
app.post( '/blog', middleware, handler )
It would be neat if we could provide a schema to our middleware so all we had to do in the middleware function was something like this:
(req, res, next) => {
const result = Joi.validate(schema, data)
}
We could create a module with a factory function and module for all our schemas. Let’s have a look at our factory function module first:
const Joi = require('joi');
const middleware = (schema, property) => {
return (req, res, next) => {
const { error } = Joi.validate(req.body, schema);
const valid = error == null;
if (valid) {
next();
} else {
const { details } = error;
const message = details.map(i => i.message).join(',');
console.log("error", message);
res.status(422).json({ error: message }) }
}
}
module.exports = middleware;
Let’s thereafter create a module for all our schemas, like so:
// schemas.js
const Joi = require('joi')
const schemas = {
blogPOST: Joi.object().keys({
title: Joi.string().required
description: Joi.string().required()
})
// define all the other schemas below
};
module.exports = schemas;
Ok then, let’s head back to our application file:
// app.js
const express = require('express')
const cors = require('cors');
const app = express()
const port = 3000
const schemas = require('./schemas');
const middleware = require('./middleware');
var bodyParser = require("body-parser");
app.use(cors());
app.use(bodyParser.json());
app.get('/', (req, res) => res.send('Hello World!'))
app.post('/blog', middleware(schemas.blogPOST) , (req, res) => {
console.log('/update');
res.json(req.body);
});
app.listen(port, () => console.log(`Example app listening on port ${port}!`))
Testing it out
There are many ways to test this out. We could do a fetch()
call from a browser console or use cURL and so on. We opt for using a chrome plugin called Advanced REST Client
.
Let’s try to make a POST request to /blog
. Remember our schema for this route said that title and description were mandatory so let's try to crash it, let's omit title and see what happens:
Aha, we get a 422
status code and the message title is required, so Joi does what it is supposed to. Just for safety sake lets re-add title:
Ok, happy days, it works again.
Support Router and Query parameters
Ok, great we can deal with BODY in POST request what about router parameters and query parameters and what would we like to validate with them:
- query parameters, here it makes sense to check that for example parameters like page and pageSize exist and is of type number. Imagine us doing a crazy request and our database contains a few million products, AOUCH :)
- router parameters, here it would make sense to first off check that we are getting a number if we should get a number that is ( we could be sending GUIDs for example ) and maybe check that we are not sending something that is obviously wrong like a 0 or something
Adding query parameters support
Ok, we know of query parameters in Express, that they reside under the request.query
. So the simplest thing we could do here is to ensure our middleware.js
takes another parameter, like so:
const middleware = (schema, property) => { }
and our full code for middleware.js
would, therefore, look like this:
const Joi = require('joi');
const middleware = (schema, property) => {
return (req, res, next) => {
const { error } = Joi.validate(req[property], schema);
const valid = error == null;
if (valid) { next(); }
else {
const { details } = error;
const message = details.map(i => i.message).join(',')
console.log("error", message);
res.status(422).json({ error: message })
}
}
}
module.exports = middleware;
This would mean we would have to have a look at app.js
and change how we invoke our middleware()
function. First off our POST request would now have to look like this:
app.post(
'/blog',
middleware(schemas.blogPOST, 'body') ,
(req, res) => {
console.log('/update');
res.json(req.body);
});
As you can see we add another argument body to our middleware()
call.
Let’s now add the request who’s query parameters we are interested in:
app.get(
'/products',
middleware(schemas.blogLIST, 'query'),
(req, res) => { console.log('/products');
const { page, pageSize } = req.query;
res.json(req.query);
});
As you can see all we have to do above is add the argument query. Lastly, let's have a look at our schemas.js
:
// schemas.js
const Joi = require('joi');
const schemas = {
blogPOST: Joi.object().keys({
title: Joi.string().required(),
description: Joi.string().required(),
year: Joi.number() }),
blogLIST: {
page: Joi.number().required(),
pageSize: Joi.number().required()
}
};
module.exports = schemas;
As you can see above we have added the blogLIST
entry.
Testing it out
Let’s head back to Advanced REST client and see what happens if we try to navigate to /products
without adding the query parameters:
As you can see Joi kicks in and tells us that page
is missing.
Let’s ensure page
and pageSize
is added to our URL and try it again:
Ok, everybody is happy again. :)
Adding router parameters support
Just like with query parameters we just need to point out where we find our parameters, in Express those reside under req.params
. Thanks to the works we already did with middleware.js
we just need to update our app.js
with our new route entry like so:
// app.js
app.get(
'/products/:id',
middleware(schemas.blogDETAIL, 'params'),
(req, res) => {
console.log("/products/:id");
const { id } = req.params;
res.json(req.params);
}
)
At this point we need to go into schemas.js
and add the blogDetail
entry so schemas.js
should now look like the following:
// schemas.js
const Joi = require('joi');
const schemas = {
blogPOST: Joi.object().keys({
title: Joi.string().required(),
description: Joi.string().required(),
year: Joi.number() }),
blogLIST: {
page: Joi.number().required(),
pageSize: Joi.number().required()
},
blogDETAIL: {
id: Joi.number().min(1).required()
}
};
module.exports = schemas;
Try it out
The last step is trying it out so let’s first test to navigate to /products/abc
. That should throw an error, we are only OK with numbers over 0:
Ok, now for a URL stating /products/0
, our other requirement:
Also, that fails, as expected.
Summary
We have introduced the validation library Joi and presented some basic features and how to use it. Lastly, we have looked at how to create a middleware for Express and use Joi in a smart way.
All in all, I hope this has been educational.
Further reading
- Joi, official docs Official docs
- Exhaustive blog post on Joi validation, if you need a more complex example, look at this Blog post
- Demo repository
Top comments (33)
Great Post! I personally use
Yup
which is based onJoi
but tailored for the frontend, smaller footprint and whatnot, its pretty much the same API and it is wonderful to work with, specially withFormik
Hi José. Appreciate the comment. Will look into Yup :)
Cool, didn't know about
Yup
.Aside from validating API responses, what other use-cases do you use it for?
on the frontend it is useful to validate form data before sending it on a request :)
does yup work on the backend and frontend, also what is the difference between yup and joi in terms of functionality, is one superior to the other in any way apart from the footprint you mentioned
Yup doesn't support Dictionary-like structure that Joi does out of the box.
github.com/jquense/yup/issues/1275...
I personally use Joi to validate my REST API routes. Each route has a controller, responsible for getting the user request parameters. That controller then passes those params to a service. On that service i have a Joi validation that looks like this:
Each validation is stored in a file that can be reused across all application/microservice. It looks like this:
Thanks for sharing Antonio :)
I've got it.
The organization which supports Joi is Hapijs. The repository, hapijs/joi sounds like happy joy.
I remember vaguely a song, something like "Happy happy joy joy; happy happy joy." Google reveals it is a song from the old 1996 television show Ren and Stimpy. Could there be a connection?
The hapi.js logo seems familiar, too. Google reveals this 2016 GitHub issue: New Logo?
Ladies and gentlemen, we got him.
Wow.. Thanks for that added context Dylan :)
Great Article Chris. Covers something I've had in my code for a while. There is one more feature that you're not covering.
Joi returns sanitized values of parameters in a 2nd parameter. For example, you can have Joi validate (truthy, falsy, etc) that 'false', false, 0, and 'N' are all equivalent to false for your filter=N query parameter. It will then return false as a boolean. By default all query parameters come through as strings.
To apply the above to your code you would do something like this to manipulate the request object with the sanitized version of the objects:
You can also append the values object to
req.options = values
that would allow you to have both. But then your code will need to know which one to grab.Would TypeScript eliminate the need for Joi (I've used Joi before at work)?
I know Flow is similar to TypeScript so usually, people won't use both.
You would get the greatest benefit by using a static typechecker like TypeScript or Flow in combination with a dynamic validator like Joi or Ajv. It works roughly like this:
For example:
I was thinking about Typescript while reading this too. In Typescript you have Typeguards which are basically a validation function (you write it, it's a normal function) which would, like Joi here, validate that the object is what you are expecting. During design time you're relatively safe, as a developer, from using the wrong type of object (because Typescript tslint will yell at you, and tsc will exception) and then during runtime you can validate using the Typeguards.
In my travels of JavaScript I realized I started writing more and more boilerplate and tons of extra code to address the fact that JavaScript is not typed and is functional first and OO second. When I finally tried Typescript I felt relieved that I could finally stop writing so much extra code to make up for the fact that JavaScript wasnt typed and didn't have OO as a first class paradigm. Also the IDE and tooling support is so amazing in Typescript.
They say JavaScript ate the world... Next will be Typescript.
I actually plan on learning TypeScript 🤣😆 I just have to get over the setup and config excuse... I know once I do it ill be able too to spin it up faster the next times... Just being the bad kind of lazy, procrastinating.
The superset though is exciting and I look forward to all its tooling and power! VSCode is a prime example of the awesomeness TS can be utilized for.
hi Jacob. Would you benefit from an article that shows how you set up TypeScript + Jest + TS and shows a CI pipeline?
Definitely. Especially if you can tie it into a project that already exists... I use React, Babel, Eslint, Parcel, Yarn if that helps at all.
I've created a GitHub template for Typescript. It doesn't teach how to set up a new project and it is opinionated but if you wanted to play around with Typescript, unit testing, code coverage, dependency injection, auto-doc creation, hot-reload and dts rollups it's a ready to go template with a VS Code workspace to boot! Take it or leave.
github.com/JustinTime4Tea/ts-template
Thanks!
Joi is a essential element in web development today!
This an excellent Article. I was wonder how I was gonna validate route level instead on controller level. Saved me a ton of time.
Thank you for that. Glad it helped :)
Thank you Chris for a great article, I have a question about Unit testing.... The question is how do you Test the next() or how do you test these schemas in general? thank you again.
hi there. I usually like a mocking approach, cause we are talking middleware right? codewithhugo.com/express-request-r...
Hey Chris, thank you very much for that prompt reply. I am ACTUALLY please and surprised with your quickness. So I looked at the example you shared. I have to be honest I am still a novice to this testing life. So I have attached my module and test. Any pointer/guidance would be appreciated.
Here is the module
Here is the test
Thank you
Thanks A lot! great post!
Thank you :)
Use of Typescript and html5 validation will be more adequate for such use cases
This was very helpful post, thank you! :)
Thank you Tuomo :)
Thanks Chris! this was really helpful :)
Thank you!
Hello developers, can someone help me with this error plz. thnx in advance stackoverflow.com/q/69960084/15454800